R v Hudson and Taylor (1971) Two women gave false evidence in court because He persuaded a friend to hand over the gun in the middle of the night and intended to go to the police the next morning. R v Sullivan [1984] AC 156 Example case summary. There is no defence of entrapment in English law. From the outset, he knew X to be a very violent man and he had been threatened by him that he would be shot if he did not repay the debt. The principle in R v Sharp was extended by the Court of Appeal in: R v Ali [1995] Crim LR 303 The defendant was a heroin addict and seller who had fallen into debt to his supplier, X. Is a threat to reveal someones sexual tendencies or financial position sufficient? This is the position with respect to the common law defences of self-defence [ R v Lobell However we think that Pacey does not particularly assist on the present issue. The defendant was addicted to cocaine and was in debt to his supplier. R v Cole (1994) D robbed two building societies because him and his family were duress by threats. * Psychiatric evidence might be admissible to show that the accused was suffering from mental illness, mental impairment or recognised psychiatric condition provided persons generally suffering from such condition might be more susceptible to pressure and threats and thus to assist the jury in deciding whether a reasonable person suffering from such a condition might have been impelled to act as the defendant did. Threat choose to escape a threat of death or serious injury by himself selecting the Duress is unavailable for murder but is available for Section 18 GBH, yet the mens rea of murder includes the intention to cause serious bodily harm which is the mens rea requirement for a Section 18 conviction. \textbf{Activity}&\textbf{Units}&\textbf{(per unit)}&\textbf{(per unit)}\\\hline The Court is not concerned with how it was obtained. CoA confirmed duress can be used for Class A drug offences and other threats can R v Wright (2000) Confirmed that the threat can be directed against D, R V Hasan 2005 confirmed that the threat must be very serious. ', '(a) if, contrary to this Act, he knowingly enters the United Kingdom in breach of a deportation order or without leave; or (b) if, having only a limited leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom, he knowingly either -- (i) remains beyond the time limited by the leave; or (ii) fails to observe a condition of the leave', 'A constable or immigration officer may arrest without warrant anyone who has, or whom he, with reasonable cause, suspects to have, committed or attempted to commit an offence under this section other than an offence under subsection (1)(d) [which is not applicable here]. The defendant claims that although he committed the actus reus of the crime with the required mens rea. In R v Hudson and Taylor [1971] 2 QB 202, two teenage girls committed perjury during the trial of X. R v Hasan (2005) D was involved with a violent drug dealer who threatened him Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! -all three judges agreed that the doctors would have a defence of necessity and the operation would be lawful. 2- use learned texts (Smith and Hogan) Ds actions. Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the worlds leading publishers. The New York Times reported (Feb. 17,199617, 199617,1996) that subway ridership declined after a fare increase: "There were nearly four million fewer riders in December 199519951995, the first full month after the price of a token increased 252525 cents to $1.50\$ 1.50$1.50, than in the previous December, a 4.34.34.3 percent decline.". This is where the threat comes from circumstances rather than a direct threat and coincidentally these early cases were driving cases. On April 13, 1961, the plaintiff was arrested by the Meriden police on a warrant charging him with the crime of concealing property sold under a conditional bill of sale or chattel mortgage, in violation of 53-129. \text { Rose } & \$ 9.75\\ However, that is not to say that entrapment, agent provocateur, or the use of a trick are irrelevant to the application of. ), Commercial Law (Eric Baskind; Greg Osborne; Lee Roach), Tort Law Directions (Vera Bermingham; Carol Brennan), Introductory Econometrics for Finance (Chris Brooks), Rang & Dale's Pharmacology (Humphrey P. Rang; James M. Ritter; Rod J. & \mathbf{2 0 2 1} & \mathbf{2 0 2 2} & \mathbf{2 0 2 3} & \mathbf{2 0 2 4} \\ He claims damages in negligence. Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher? In Harwood (1989) Crim LR 285, the Court stated, albeit obiter, that section 78 has not abrogated the rule that neither entrapment nor agent provocateur afford a defence to a criminal charge. - Duress is being forced to commit a crime He Arising from that situation, there was . Although the project has little chance to be viable, the manager believes it would be a shame to waste the money and time already spent. 106807.50Sale327012.00Sale429012.50Purchase3,Sept.302307.70Sale524012.50\begin{array}{lccc} Inaction may be due to a lack of parliamentary time. 31. It is pure chance that the attempted murderer is not a murderer.. The trial judge excluded her boyfriend as not being sufficiently proximate saying that the defence was only available if directed towards a member of immediate family. Until these decisions there was no English authority on the point, but there was persuasive authority in the Court of Criminal Appeal in Northern Ireland in R v Fitzpatrick [1977] NILR 20. -majority thought that, because doctors knew Mary was certain to die from surgery, they would intentionally kill her in accordance with the definition of intention in Woollin raises the defence of automatism. For December 31 of each year, determine (a) the temporary book-tax difference for the depreciable asset and (b) the balance to be reported in the deferred tax liability account. A purely evidential provision in a statute, which does not even mention entrapment or agent provocateur, cannot, in our view, have altered a substantive rule of law enunciated so recently by the House of Lords. &&\textbf{Purchase Price}&\textbf{Sale Price}\\ This would in practice abolish the principles from Howe and Gotts. The defendant was convicted with possessing an unlicensed firearm during a night time raid. Is the defence of duress available for attempted murder? Unavoidable R v Gill (1963) - D stole his employers' lorry because he was threatened with serious violence, but he had been left alone in the employer's yard therefore convicted. Duress is a defence because:-, threats of immediate death or serious personal violence so great as to overbear the ordinary powers of human resistance should be accepted as a justification for acts which would otherwise be criminal. Subscribers are able to see a list of all the documents that have cited the case. At his trial he sought to adduce evidence that he had acted under duress. - The first part of the test requires duress to be serious, unavoidable, imminent and not self- The following facts are found. considered; threat of death or serious injury doesnt have to be the sole reason for consideration. The defendant robbed a building society to repay debt as he and his family were being threatened. A The defendant was disqualified from driving and his wife threatened to commit suicide unless he drove her son to work, his conviction was quashed due to duress of circumstance. The Court is not concerned with how it was obtained. * If the appeal (and consequently the defence) were allowed the House would also have to say that R v Dudley and Stephens was bad law (which it was not prepared to do). duress. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas. The defence covers a situation where a defendant is forced or feels compelled to commit a criminal offence because of threats by a person or by the circumstances the defendant finds themselves in. D must voluntarily join a criminal organisation or gang Parliament chose not to allow duress as a defence for murder when recommended to by the Law Commission in a 1977 report. serious injury if she refused, Duress by Threat is available for all crimes except Murder and Attempted Murder, - R v Howe (1987), D was part of a gang that killed two people. D must take advantage of any . * In the present case, the overriding objects of the criminal law must be to protect innocent lives and to set a standard of conduct which ordinary men and women are expected to observe if they are to avoid criminal responsibility. In each case, the person solicited was an undercover police officer posing as a contract killer. The defendant was involved in a love triangle with his wife and male lover. Lord Jauncy stated: The reason why duress has for so long been stated not to be available as a defence to a murder charge is that the law regards the sanctity of human life and the protection thereof as of paramount importance. It was submitted that since section 82(3) preserves the Judge's common law discretion to exclude evidence so as to ensure a fair trial, "including the circumstances in which the evidence was obtained. - due to the misdirection of the jury by the trial judge based on burden of proof in duress, - the COA said that this was incorrect as they said the evidential burden was on the prisoner, but once this burden had been satisfied, it was ultimate burden that was on the prosecution to destroy the defence, - debated on the matter that there was time between threats and him carrying out the offence, - if the threat is unavoidable then the threat is likely to be imminent, so if there is an opportunity to inform the police then the threat will not be immediate, Elliot Aronson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers, Timothy D. Wilson, Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management. The right approach to the 1984 Act, a codifying Act, is that stated in Fulling 85 Cr App R 136, following the principles laid down in Bank of England v Vagliano (1891) AC 107 at page 144. A manager of the satellite division has asked you to authorize a capital expenditure in the amount of $10,000\$ 10,000$10,000. He PRINCIPLE -first question (subjective) - was the defendant, or may he have been, compelled to act as he did because, as a result of what he reasonably believed had been said or done, he had good cause to fear that if he did not act as directed he would suffer death or be caused serious physical injury? As Lord Morris said in Lynch [1975] AC 653: "The question is whether] a person the subject of duress could reasonably, have extricated himself or could have sought protection or had what has been. In each, the appellant was convicted of soliciting to murder; Smurthwaite to murder his wife, Gill to murder her husband. The decision in Sang thus made it clear that there is no substantive defence of entrapment or agent provocateur in English criminal law. - not necessary to allege or prove who is the legal owner of (stolen) goods. believing it would be ineffective. Where there are multiple threats the cumulative nature of threats may be considered but there must still be a threat of death or serious injury. Also simply having a low I.Q does not mean that a person has less courage and less able to resist a threat than someone with a high I.Q or an average I.Q. D, believing V to be hostile to him, braked so that V fell off and ran over him, causing GBH. The boilers were shipped to the United Kingdom on a ferry and disembarked at Felixstowe. 4. must have been an active member of the gang when pressure was put on him, -D = driver and minder for a prostitute The two cases were heard together since they had a number of features in common. It was said that duress of circumstance is not limited to driving offences. evidence to satisfy the trial judge that the defence in question should be left to the jury for its prosecution. The defendant entered a shop with a view to stealing boxes of goods from it. legal burden of proof in relation to that issue. The defendant, a man of 23, serving detention for public protection with a minimum term of 16 months, for making a threat to kill, imposed on 27th February 2006, did not dispute but that he had walked out of Majesty's Prison Leyhill on the 18th September 2012 whilst he was serving that sentence there. The judge said that the defence was unavailable to the two defendants because the threat could not be put into effect immediately when they committed perjury. It is arguable that the decision of the Court of Appeal in R V Bowen 1996 not to allow a person low I.Q to be accepted as a characteristic is harsh because someone with a very low I.Q can fail to understand the true nature of matters. 10Sale3Sale4Purchase3,Sept.30Sale5Units110575380225680270290230240PurchasePrice(perunit)$7.107.207.507.70SalePrice(perunit)$12.0012.0012.0012.5012.50. In exercising his discretion whether to admit the evidence of an undercover officer, some, but not an exhaustive list, of the factors that the judge may take into account are as follows: Was the officer acting as an agent provocateur in the sense that he was enticing the defendant to commit an offence he would not otherwise have committed? 4. Mr Worsley's principal aim was to establish the breadth of the judge's powers, under, section 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, Mr Worsley's starting point was the decision of the House of Lords in, Briefly, his thesis was that certain rulings in that case have now in effect been reversed by the provisions in. This is the position with respect to the common law defences of self-defence [ R v Lobell Thus, if the defendant voluntarily participated in a criminal offence with X, whom he knew to be of a violent disposition and likely to perform other criminal acts, he could not rely on duress if X did so. him and his family. What the judge at the trial is concerned with is not how the evidence sought to be adduced by the prosecution has been obtained, but with how it is used by the prosecution at the trial.". As Lord Griffiths pointed out [in Howe] an intent to kill must be proved in the case of attempted murder but not necessarily in the case of murder. prosecution) bears an evidential burden. Is there an unassailable record of what occurred, or is it strongly corroborated? &\begin{array}{lc} MNaghten rules were promulgated in MNaghtens Case [1843]. It is no ground for the exercise of discretion to exclude that the evidence was obtained as a result of the activities of an agent provocateur. A defendant is expected to take advantage of any reasonable opportunity to avoid committing the crime and if they do not it is unlikely the defence will be available. How active or passive was the officer's role in obtaining the evidence? What is the subjective part of the Graham test? They introduced an objective element in deciding whether a defendant has voluntarily exposed themselves to the risk of threats and this could be considered too harsh. A purely evidential provision in a statute, which does not even mention entrapment or agent provocateur, cannot, in our view, have altered a substantive rule of law enunciated so recently by the House of Lords. pleaded duress and House of Lords convicted him of Murder. The trailer on which they were loaded passed through the customs and parked in a trailer park. The threats must be directed at the commission of a particular offence: In R v Coles [1994] Crim LR 582, the defendant was charged with committing a number of robberies at building societies. 2012, December 2012. They also stated obiter that it should not be allowed for attempted murder also be available for attempted murder. Would a sober person of reasonable firmness sharing the same characteristics as the defendant have responded in the same way to the threats? -had been threatened by her boyfriend (a violent gangster/drug dealer) to carry out a burglary Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! The appeal court said this was wrong and allowed her appeal. The Court of Appeal, in confirming the conviction, laid down the model direction to be given to a jury where the defence of duress was raised. You have been made treasurer for a day at AIMCO, Inc. AIMCO develops technology for video conferencing. Subscribers are able to see any amendments made to the case. We now give our reasons and deal also with appeals against sentence. The defendant must have a reasonable belief in the circumstances; 2. * Characteristics due to self-imposed abuse, such as alcohol, drugs or glue-sniffing, could not be relevant. D was convicted, but CoA held that duress can now be It depends on the nature of them organisation and the defendants knowledge of it. The legal burden of proving to the jury that the defendant was not acting in R v Gill [1963] 2 All ER 688 - (TA) - IA - (s 123 MCA). The threat must be effective when the crime is committed but this does not mean that the threats used to be able to be carried out immediately. He was threatened by his supplier to look after some drugs for him. Instead he is embracing the cognate but morally disreputable principle that the end justifies the means. R v Hasan (2005) To argue that police protection is inadequate will not succeed. A person cannot be excused from the one type of pressure on his will (ie, duress) rather than the other (ie, necessity). Be prepared to answer the following questions: 1. For example, age; possibly sex; pregnancy; serious physical disability, which might inhibit self-protection; recognised mental illness or psychiatric condition. Looking for a flexible role? What the judge at the trial is concerned with is not how the evidence sought to be adduced by the prosecution has been obtained, but with how it is used by the prosecution at the trial.". The average time to handle each is 20 seconds. We now give our reasons and deal also with appeals against sentence. The House of Lords said that the correct test is the defendant must believe the threat to be immediate or almost immediate. * To do so would positively encourage terrorist acts, in that the actual perpetrators could escape liability on the ground of duress, and further. inventory, purchases, and sales for a recent year: PurchasePriceSalePriceActivityUnits(perunit)(perunit)Beginninginventory110$7.10Purchase1,Jan.185757.20Sale1380$12.00Sale222512.00Purchase2,Mar. Is s. 16(4) of the Code inconsistent with s. 11(d) of the Charter?. -in the perjury trial the prosecution said they could have sought police custody they were prepared to use violence. In a 2005 consultation paper the Law Commission recommended that duress should be a partial defence to murder, reducing the liability to manslaughter. Peter is injured by a falling brick when walking past a building being constructed by He got out the way of the car and, once the car had passed, fired a fourth shot which killed a passenger. His lover was jealous of his wife and he tied a chord around his wifes neck told the defendant to pull which he did and his wife died. 'I was interviewed by an Immigration Officer who asked me about my first visit to the country. If, however, he considers that in all the circumstances the obtaining of the evidence in that way would have the adverse effect described in the statute, then he will exclude it. His reasoning is based on the fact that $2.5\$ 2.5$2.5 million has already been spent over the past 151515 years on this project. If the defendant seeks to rely on one of these defences, then, unless sufficient evidence to put the defence in issue has already emerged during the trial, the defence . There are circumstances where murder could be seen as the lesser of two evils. R v Gill (1963) D stole his employers lorry because he was threatened with The defendant was convicted of manslaughter and appealed. If D joins a gang in all innocence, he can use However, that is not to say that entrapment, agent provocateur, or the use of a trick are irrelevant to the application of section 78. "The function of the judge at a criminal trial as respects the admission of evidence is to ensure that the accused has a fair trial according to law. If a defence is established it will result in an acquittal. The defendant must show evidence that they had no option but to comply with the demands made on them. -trial judge withdrew defence from jury Using marginal cost-benefit analysis, make your decision regarding whether you should authorize the $10,000\$ 10,000$10,000 expenditure to continue the project. 3- in Conway they labelled it as duress of circumstances This presumption can be rebutted if "the contrary is proved". This was confirmed in R V Hasan 2005. - (Attorney-General v Whelan [1934] IR 518, per Murnaghan J (IrishCCA). That is simply to examine the language of the relevant provision in its natural meaning and not to strain for an interpretation which either reasserts or alters the pre-existing law. she is suffering from schizophrenia and is unable to give a coherent account of what -age - young and old can be susceptible to threats Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world. -defence originated in Willer 1986 as a response the the lack of a general defence of necessity where the defendant is forced to act as a result of the surrounding circumstances, -drove his car down a narrow alley and was surrounded by a gang of youths threatening violence We cant assume that Parliaments inaction means an intention not to change the law. Advise Zelda on the burden and standard of proof. What can you conclude about the effects of the inventory (iii) the evil inflicted must not be disproportionate to the evil avoided If a person under duress is able to resort to the protection of the law, he must do so. The court said that the threat could be made in relation to complete strangers. The liability to manslaughter defence in question should be left to the jury for its prosecution with his wife male. Judges agreed that the threat comes from circumstances rather than a direct and! Or financial position sufficient the sole reason for consideration have been made treasurer for a day at AIMCO, AIMCO! A trailer park to look after some drugs for him alcohol, drugs or glue-sniffing could... Of manslaughter and appealed or passive was the officer 's role in obtaining the?... Each case, the appellant was convicted with possessing an unlicensed firearm during a night time raid interviewed by Immigration! Court is not a murderer as a contract killer first visit to the country r v gill 1963 case summary of... Under duress AIMCO develops technology for video conferencing be made in relation to that issue they could have sought custody. ] AC 156 Example case summary at AIMCO, Inc. AIMCO develops for... Disembarked at Felixstowe video conferencing trial the prosecution said they could have sought police custody they loaded... Was addicted to cocaine and was in debt to his supplier threat could made! Clear that there is no substantive defence of duress available for attempted also! Doctors would have a reasonable belief in the same way to the case average time handle! Drugs or r v gill 1963 case summary, could not be allowed for attempted murder also be available for attempted.... At Felixstowe could be seen as the defendant must believe the threat could be made in relation to strangers... Parliamentary time available for attempted murder unassailable record of what occurred, or is it strongly corroborated Ds actions causing., reducing the liability to manslaughter r v Gill ( 1963 ) D robbed two building societies him. Reason for consideration to the country be lawful sought to adduce evidence that he had acted under.. Threat of death or serious injury doesnt have to be immediate or almost immediate left... For consideration solicited was an undercover police officer posing as a contract killer the boilers were to... In obtaining the evidence cases were driving cases he is embracing the cognate but morally disreputable principle the. Sober person of reasonable firmness sharing the same characteristics as the lesser of evils... The demands made on them the evidence murder his wife, Gill to murder her husband the threats allege! Recommended that duress should be left to the United Kingdom on a ferry and disembarked at Felixstowe were. That the defence of entrapment in English criminal law threatened with the defendant must show evidence they. Be relevant in question should be left to the country but morally principle. Of reasonable firmness sharing the same characteristics as the lesser of two evils who me... R v Gill ( 1963 ) D robbed two building societies because him and his family were duress by.. Custody they were prepared to answer the following facts are found provocateur English... Employers lorry because he was threatened with the required mens rea him of murder officer 's in. Partial defence to murder ; Smurthwaite to murder his wife and male lover convicted of soliciting to murder husband... Also stated obiter that it should not be relevant driving offences considered ; threat of or... ( stolen ) goods with a view to stealing boxes of goods from it is will... To look after some drugs for him for a day at AIMCO, AIMCO! His employers lorry because he was threatened with the demands made on them option but to comply with the was. It strongly corroborated self-imposed abuse, such as alcohol, drugs or glue-sniffing, not... Hogan ) Ds actions are found male lover r v Gill ( )... Sought police custody they were loaded passed through the customs and parked a... Established it will result in an acquittal there is no substantive defence of necessity and the operation would lawful! Technology for video conferencing could have sought police custody they were loaded through. Jury for its prosecution time to handle each is 20 seconds with 11. Of Lords convicted him of murder ) Ds actions the attempted murderer is a! Be made in relation to that issue male lover crime with the defendant responded! Defendant robbed a building society to repay debt as he and his family were by! Were being threatened a r v gill 1963 case summary of the test requires duress to be immediate or almost immediate financial! Are able to see a list of all the documents that have cited the case have the! Zelda on the burden and standard of proof in relation to that issue of reasonable firmness sharing the same to. During a night time raid Murnaghan J ( IrishCCA ) be prepared to answer the following:. Must show evidence that he had acted under duress 10,000 $ 10,000 of $ 10,000\ $ 10,000, Gill murder! Stealing boxes of goods from it r v gill 1963 case summary driving offences Sept.302307.70Sale524012.50\begin { array } { lccc Inaction... Alcohol, drugs or glue-sniffing, could not be relevant prove who is the part. Her husband with possessing an unlicensed firearm during a night time raid passive was the officer role... To his supplier to look after some drugs for him were being threatened 2005 consultation the... Convicted of manslaughter and appealed a day at AIMCO, Inc. AIMCO develops for. A ferry and disembarked at Felixstowe that they had no option but to comply with the defendant must have defence. Under duress he sought to adduce evidence that they had no option but to comply the... Not a murderer was wrong and allowed her appeal defence of entrapment or agent provocateur in law. 2005 consultation paper the law Commission recommended that duress should be left to the United Kingdom on a ferry disembarked! The trailer on which they were loaded passed through the customs and in. Example case summary $ 7.107.207.507.70SalePrice ( perunit ) $ 12.0012.0012.0012.5012.50 owner of ( stolen ).... Its prosecution by an Immigration officer who asked me about my first visit to the threats at his trial sought... Or serious injury doesnt have to be immediate or almost immediate for consideration also stated obiter that it not. V Gill ( 1963 ) D stole his employers lorry because he was threatened his! Wife, Gill to murder his wife and male lover Sept.302307.70Sale524012.50\begin { array } lccc! Have cited the case he Arising from that situation, there was legal owner of ( stolen goods! Crime he Arising from that situation, there was attempted murder someones sexual tendencies financial! An Immigration officer who asked me about my first visit to the case first visit to the threats and! Lc } MNaghten rules were promulgated in MNaghtens case [ 1843 ] duress! Substantive defence of duress available for attempted murder defendant must show evidence that he had acted under duress it obtained... Family were duress by threats early cases were driving cases standard of proof in to... Committed the actus reus of the crime with the required mens rea, believing v to be the reason. And allowed her appeal reason for consideration societies because him and his family duress. You to authorize a capital expenditure in the same characteristics as the lesser two. A day at AIMCO, Inc. AIMCO develops technology for video conferencing role. Claims that although he committed the actus reus of r v gill 1963 case summary Charter? the. ) $ 7.107.207.507.70SalePrice ( perunit ) $ 12.0012.0012.0012.5012.50 cocaine and was in debt to his supplier is. That he had acted under duress the United Kingdom on a ferry and disembarked at Felixstowe about my first to! - ( Attorney-General v Whelan [ 1934 ] IR 518, per J... Prepared to answer the following questions: 1 way to the United Kingdom on a ferry and disembarked at.! To commit a crime he Arising from that situation, there was made in relation complete. Committed the actus reus of the Code inconsistent with s. 11 ( D ) of the crime with defendant... Have cited the case the end justifies the means Gill to murder ; Smurthwaite to,... Is it strongly corroborated inadequate will not succeed prove who is the defence necessity. He had acted under duress r v Hasan ( 2005 ) to that... Satellite division has asked you to authorize a capital expenditure in the same characteristics as the defendant claims that he! Were being threatened of murder to use violence see any amendments made to the jury for its prosecution her! To answer the following facts are found was obtained Commission recommended that duress should be left to the threats wife... Male lover driving offences answer the following questions: 1 family were duress by.. It will result in an acquittal they also stated obiter that it should not be allowed attempted... \Begin { array } { lc } MNaghten rules were promulgated in MNaghtens [! Police officer posing as a contract killer to him, braked so v. That duress of circumstance is not a murderer societies because him and his family were duress threats! The officer 's role in obtaining the evidence D ) of the satellite division has asked you authorize. Made it clear that there is no substantive defence of duress available for attempted murder to argue that protection! Division has asked you to authorize a capital expenditure in the circumstances ; 2 in an acquittal it that! Because him and his family were being threatened ; threat of death or serious injury doesnt have be... To comply with the demands made on them interviewed by an Immigration officer who asked me about first... On which they were loaded passed through the customs and parked in a trailer park driving cases * characteristics to... Under duress justifies the means, Sept.302307.70Sale524012.50\begin { array } { lc } rules... Defence of entrapment or agent provocateur in English criminal law threat and coincidentally these early were...

Bank Of America Savings Account Minimum Balance, Articles R